Web Toolbar by Wibiya

Sunday, 4 March 2012

American GAP National Taxpayers Union Petition: No International Bank Bailouts without Whistleblower Protections! by Shelley Waldenon on The Whistleblogger



Petition: No International Bank Bailouts without Whistleblower Protections!


by Shelley Waldenon March 02, 2012 ( The Whistleblogger / 2012 )

Dear GAP Supporter:

Last December, while US taxpayers were doing their holiday shopping, Congress quietly approved more than $35 billion in bailouts to international development banks. These multilateral development banks (MDBs) are immune from national oversight and laws, both here and abroad. They are riddled with corruption and blatantly resist any meaningful internal governance reform. Experts estimate that $26 – $130 billion have been lost to corruption at the World Bank alone since its founding, to say nothing of the other MDBs.

Fortunately, Congress hasn't issued a blank check. According to a federal law that was passed in December, before the U.S. can contribute tens of billions of dollars in cold cash and guarantees to the World Bank, the Inter-American Development Bank and the African Development Bank, the Treasury Department must report that each institution is making substantial progress toward implementing certain reforms – including best practice whistleblower protections. That's where you come in.

Please sign our petition to demand the Treasury Department to conduct – and release for public comment – a credible review that details the implementation of the MDB's whistleblower protections!


The Treasury Department is required to submit a report to Congress about the MDBs' progress on these reform measures. Without oversight from the American people, Treasury is expected to quietly issue a report that rubber-stamps MDB practices that have condoned retaliation against whistleblowers. The report may well approve the bailouts, although the Banks have yet to even adopt best practice whistleblower protections, let alone implement them.

A comprehensive survey of more than 5,400 executives worldwide found that whistleblowers detect more economic crimes than corporate security, internal audits, fraud risk management and law enforcement combined. And why wouldn't they? Workers on the inside are often the only individuals with knowledge of corruption who aren't involved in the scheme. Strong whistleblower protections are crucial to ensuring that economic crimes are detected and that the billions of American taxpayer dollars flowing into them are spent appropriately. Together, we can ensure that before another penny of taxpayer money is distributed, the MDBs are held accountable for implementing strong whistleblower protections.

Please sign our petition to demand the Treasury Department to conduct – and release for public comment – a credible review that details the implementation of the MDB's whistleblower protections!


This petition is a joint project of GAP and the National Taxpayers Union.


Shelley Walden is International Officer for the Government Accountability Project, the nation's leading whistleblower protection and advocacy organization.

Read Full Article at: The Whistleblogger - Petition: No International Bank Bailouts without Whistleblower Protections! - Government Accountability Project

Find Government Accountability Project GAP Facebook


Write About Or Link To This Post On Your Blog - Easy Links :
Link Directly To This Post :

Link To The Homepage :
Subscribe in a reader Follow rtotalglobal on Twitter

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Public Services Human Rights Destruction Revealed: Government Plans For Police Privatisation



Public Services Human Rights Destruction Revealed: government plans for police privatisation
West Midlands and Surrey police offer £1.5bn contract under which private firms may investigate crime and detain suspects


Street patrols could be handled by security firms under the government's police privatisation plans. Photograph: Guardian



Key extract of contract note for bidders for police services
These are two of 26 pages of a contract note seen by the Guardian which has been sent to potential bidders to run all services that 'can be legally delegated to the private sector'

Private companies could take responsibility for investigating crimes, patrolling neighbourhoods and even detaining suspects under a radical privatisation plan being put forward by two of the largest police forces in the country.

West Midlands and Surrey have invited bids from G4S and other major security companies on behalf of all forces across England and Wales to take over the delivery of a wide range of services previously carried out by the police.

The contract is the largest on police privatisation so far, with a potential value of £1.5bn over seven years, rising to a possible £3.5bn depending on how many other forces get involved.

This scale dwarfs the recent £200m contract between Lincolnshire police and G4S, under which half the force's civilian staff are to join the private security company, which will also build and run a police station for the first time.


The home secretary, Theresa May, who has imposed a 20% cut in Whitehall grants on forces, has said frontline policing can be protected by using the private sector to transform services provided to the public, but this is the first clear indication of what that will mean in practice. May said on Thursday that she hoped the "business partnership" programme would be in place next spring.

A 26-page "commercial in confidence" contract note seen by the Guardian has been sent to potential bidders to run all services that "can be legally delegated to the private sector". They do not include those that involve the power of arrest and the other duties of a sworn constable.

Companies who have applied through the Bluelight emergency services e-tendering website have been invited to a "bidders' conference" on 14 March, with an anticipated contract start date of next February.

The timetable for the programme means it will be subject to final sign-off by the first police and crime commissioner for the West Midlands after their election in November. The existing police authority only gave the go-ahead for the tendering stage last month after a "robust and forthright discussion" which ended with a rare 11-5 split vote.

The joint West Midlands/Surrey "transformation" programme, which has strong backing from the Home Office, looks set to completely redraw the accepted boundaries between public and private and the definition of frontline and back-office policing.


The programme has the potential to become the main vehicle for outsourcing police services in England and Wales. It has been pioneered by the West Midlands chief constable, Chris Sims, and Mark Rowley, who has just moved to the Metropolitan police from the post of Surrey chief constable. The pair lead on these matters for the Association of Chief Police Officers.

The breathtaking list of policing activities up for grabs includes investigating crimes, detaining suspects, developing cases, responding to and investigating incidents, supporting victims and witnesses, managing high-risk individuals, patrolling neighbourhoods, managing intelligence, managing engagement with the public, as well as more traditional back-office functions, such as managing forensics, providing legal services, managing the vehicle fleet, finance and human resources.

A West Midlands police authority spokesman said: "Combining with the business sector is aimed at totally transforming the way the force currently does business – improving the service provided to the public.

The areas of service listed in this notice are deliberately broad to allow the force to explore the skills, expertise and solutions a partnership could bring." He said not all the activities listed would necessarily be included in the final scope of the contract, but if the force added other activities later a "new and costly procurement exercise" would be needed.

The contract notice does state that "bidders should note that not all these activities will necessarily be included in the final scope, and that each police force will select some activities from these areas where they see the best opportunities for transformation". But the police clearly want to test whether it is possible for new areas of policing to be provided by private companies.

The contract is being offered in two lots, one covering custody services and the second all other services. It envisages that only one company will be awarded the main contract, although a second may run custody services separately.

The West Midlands police are already planning to cut 2,764 police jobs over the next three years and this privatisation programme is not designed to meet the immediate budget gaps. The savings are expected to show after 2014.

Ben Priestley, Unison's national office for police and justice, which covers many police civilian staff, said it was alarmed by the programme: "Bringing the private sector into policing is a dangerous experiment with local safety and taxpayers' money," he said. "We are urging police authorities not to fall into the trap of thinking the private sector is the answer to the coalition's cuts. The fact that the Home Office is refusing to publish its business case – even under FOI [the Freedom of Information Act] – speaks for itself.

"Privatisation means that the police will be less accountable to the public. And people will no longer be able to go to the Independent Police Complaints Commission if they have a problem. When a critical incident happens, a force's ability to respond will be severely compromised. The only winners are private companies and shareholders who make profits at the expense of local services."

A number of other forces, including Cleveland, Avon and Somerset, and Cheshire, have been exploring the services that might be offered to the private sector, albeit on a smaller scale.

Cleveland police have a 10-year contract with IT firm Steria to provide call handling, front desk staffing, and aspects of the criminal justice system on top of computer services, finance and training. Reliance security runs Cleveland's custody suites.

Avon and Somerset had a contract with IBM, called South West One, which suffered problems in its first three years. Some services are to be taken back in-house. Cheshire has a more traditional contract with Capgemini to provide finance, facilities and fleet management.

There is not expected to be any shortage of bidders. When Lincolnshire put its then groundbreaking contract out to tender last March, 12 companies responded with submissions.

Source: Guardian - Revealed: government plans for police privatisation

Portuguese version in: Revolta Total Global Democracia Real Já - Acorda Povo! Política Fascista Global Destruição de Direitos Liberdades e Garantias do Sector Público: Privatização da Polícia no Reino Unido

WAKE UP PEOPLE, TAKE ACTION REVOLT AGAINST GLOBAL UNSLAVEMENT AGENDA


Write About Or Link To This Post On Your Blog - Easy Links :
Link Directly To This Post :

Link To The Homepage :
Subscribe in a reader Follow rtotalglobal on Twitter

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Recent Posts

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...